Harvard pushing further into farm sector with California Central Coast vineyard play

With the California wine market on a cyclical upswing, Harvard Management Company, the Boston-based investment shop for Harvard University’s $33 billion endowment, is quietly assembling a Central Coast vineyard play. The area—located between San Francisco and Los Angeles—is rising in stature as a wine grape-growing region, with Wine Enthusiast magazine dubbing the Paso Robles American Viticultural Area as last year’s “Wine Region of the Year”.

The region is in the cross-hairs of numerous investors. Last November, Hancock Agricultural Investment Group paid $44 million for two Monterey County vineyards totaling 1,582 acres. Hancock, a Boston-based unit of Canadian insurer Manulife Financial Corp., overseas $2.1 billion of farm real estate.

Mercator Research confirmed Harvard is making its Central Coast purchases via Brodiaea Inc.—a Delaware domiciled entity formed in June 2012. Last month, Brodiaea paid $10.1 million or $1,322 per acre for a 7,622-acre cattle ranch in northeast Santa Barbara County. Brodiaea has spent $61 million so far to acquire 10,176 acres in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, estimates David Hamel, an appraiser in Santa Maria.

Harvard’s recent Central Coast vineyard investments were initially puzzling in light of the endowment’s November 2011 sale of its anchor stakes in Silverado Premium Properties, LLC and Silverado Winegrowers Holdings LLC, two private Napa, Calif.-based vineyard sale-leaseback investment funds heavily invested in the Central Coast counties of Monterey, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara. At the time of the sale, market participants estimated that Silverado Premium Properties’ holdings were worth $500 million, suggesting Harvard and co-investor Hancock Agricultural Investment Group received around $375 million from buyer TIAA-CREF, for their combined 75% stake in Silverado Premium Properties and a 79% interest in Silverado Winegrowers Holdings. Market contacts suggest that Harvard exited Silverado after it became apparent that the endowment’s aggressive vineyard investment plan could compete with Silverado.

Brodiaea’s investment’s are being assembled and managed by Grapevine Capital Partners, a San Luis Obispo venture launched in 2012 by James Ontiveros and Matt Turrentine. Mr. Turrentine declined to identify the funding source for Brodiaea.

Andrew Wiltshire, Harvard Management’s alternative assets manager, also declined to comment on the investment. In January, Harvard secured 125 investors to enable Brodiaea to qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust. A REIT structure would make it easier for additional investors to join or exit the venture, and could also pave the way for an eventual public stock offering.

Between July 2012 and February 2014, Harvard representatives have knocked on doors and quietly spent $61 million for 10,176 acres in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties.

The Brodiaea purchases have attracted local attention for both the market-leading prices paid for properties, and Grapevine Capital’s approach of methodically soliciting sales of unlisted properties. Near Shandon, a farming town in proximity to several large vineyard plantings, Brodiaea paid an estimated $40,366 per plantable acre. That works out to premiums of $5,000 to $10,000 per acre based on historical sales in Shandon. “The sales weren’t making any sense when they came across,” notes an area appraiser.

Though Brodiaea was aggressively bidding at the top of the market, the purchases could pay off if the vineyards can produce big crops and ride the recovering wine grape cycle.

Some market observers have wondered if Brodiaea was a well-timed water play in light of the region’s worsening groundwater shortage. Last August, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors adopted an “urgency” ordinance that prohibits any new development or new irrigated crop production unless the water it uses is offset by an equal amount of conservation. Water levels in the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin have fallen sharply in recent years—two to six feet a year in some areas—causing wells to go dry and forcing many vineyards and rural residents to drill deeper wells, according to local accounts. The irrigation development restriction remains in place through August 26, 2015. The basin supplies water for 40% of the county’s agriculture sector.

Brodiaea’s managers are now busy ripping out old vines on the San Luis Obispo tracts and redeveloping the properties. Development studies are still underway for the Santa Barbara ranch.

Brodiaea’s purchases followed a 2009 Harvard Business School case study which focused on water resources and farming in California’s Central Valley. Mr. Ontiveros says the timing of Brodiaea’s irrigated land purchases in San Luis Obispo County and the subsequent moratorium on new irrigation development was “pure coincidence.”

Harvard’s California farmland investments are just one of numerous bets in the agriculture and timber sectors that are spread across New Zealand, Romania, Latvia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Panamá. The university continues to expand its near six-year old Dairy Farms Partnership, a New Zealand venture in Central Otago, which has grown from 1,125 dairy cattle in 2009 to 7,803 head in 2013.

Harvard bought New Zealand's Big Sky Dairy out of bankruptcy in 2010.

For the year ended June 2013, Harvard valued its New Zealand farm land holdings at $42.8 million, up 49% from the prior year total of $28.7 million, according to a company filing. The venture’s dairy cattle were valued at an additional $11.1 million.  Dairy Farms Partnership also holds stock in New Zealand-based global milk processer and marketer Fonterra Group Co-op Ltd. valued at $10.7 million, and smaller stakes in five fertilizer, farm supply, genetics and irrigation companies. Harvard Management jump-started Dairy Farms Partnership in 2010 by buying the 3,451-acre Big Sky Dairy Farm out of receivership for NZ$34.2 million (Farmland Investor Letter, Dec. 2010). The university made a “bolt-on” acquisition in June 2012 by paying NZ$2.5 million for a nearby 3,415-acre dairy. The deal included NZ$1.2 million for shares of Fonterra.

The Harvard dairy venture reported a $2.9 million operating loss for its fiscal year ended last June, versus a $1.7 million profit in 2012. However, after booking a $3.6 million 2013 paper gain in the value of its farmland holdings, the dairy reported a $4.9 million overall profit. Prospects are looking up this year on expanding global demand for dairy products.  The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture expects the U.S. farm price for milk to average $21.20 per hundredweight this year, versus the $12.83 farmers received in 2009. ■

© 2014 Farmland Investor Letter All rights reserved.

This entry was posted in Agricultural Investment, Vineyard and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Harvard pushing further into farm sector with California Central Coast vineyard play

  1. My name is Cindy Steinbeck of Steinbeck Vineyards and Winery in Paso Robles, CA. My seven-generation family has been farming land in Paso Robles for 130 years. We love our community and want to continue farming and enjoying life in North San Luis Obispo County. However, that future has been seriously threatened by recent political action adversely impacting our water rights. My family, along with other landowners including rural residential who overlie the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin, have taken the lead in our community to stand up to protect our rights through an action called Quiet Title.

    I recently read and appreciate your article entitled “Harvard Pushing Further Into Farm Sector With California Central Coast Vineyard Play”
    regarding recent investments in the Paso Robles area. I would also like to let you know a local journalist, Mr. Daniel Blackburn, has also written an article entitled Water District Booster Buying Land for Harvard U. I found it interesting that you are researching this issue from the farming angle whereas I have been looking at similar connections (and more) from the “water market” angle.

    Matt Turrentine, the California representative for Brodiaea, Inc., is a board member of PRAAGS (Paso Robles Agricultural Alliance for Groundwater Solutions). PRAAGS is aggressively trying to establish a water district over the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin that will have the power to export our basin water. I strongly believe various outside corporate investors have ulterior motives in “investing” above the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin. I believe that the investments you are researching with respect to Brodiaea, Inc. and Ontiveras/Turrentine might be less about the future investment in grapes and much more about the water “futures” market.

    There has been a blatant lack of transparency from the local government as well as water district proponents as to their true agenda and who will benefit and or profit from its formation. This is very concerning to me because this district, if formed, will end up utilizing public funds. Additionally, the proposed district requires 51% of the acreage to vote in the affirmative to pass. Thirty landowners own 51% of the land overlying the basin. The district could be formed by their vote alone. This vote would disenfranchise over 5,000 smaller landowners, forcing them into a water district.

  2. Pingback: Harvard purchases $60mil+ in California vineyards | Responsible Investment at Harvard Coalition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>